This case tells the story of the government's decision to develop the city of Philadelphia under state rival private high-speed connection to the Internet system ("broadband"). The case is described as'' a city with a justification, its desire to attract new business and his fear that the "digital gap" leaves poor people without affordable access to the World Wide Web, and the means to implement its decision on the basis of a new not-for-profit arm of city authority, which would contract with a private provider. This is a private provider would be willing to provide a relatively inexpensive wireless network access throughout the city, creating the largest wireless network in the United States today, in turn, the city will manage its own business information technology to the new system, which was designed to compete with private companies, Verizon and Comcast. Event is designed to promote discussion of the nature and causes of monopoly raises questions about the current cable and phone companies use market power in any of the services they offer, and, if so, then it is advisable to build a new municipal system competition. HKS Case Number 1824.0 "Hide
Esther Scott on 3 pages. Publication Date: December 20, 2005. Prod. #: HKS573-PDF-ENG
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China
SecondMarket – Providing Liquidity for Shareholders of Privately Held iContact
Systems Infrastructure at Google (B)
Bank of America-Merrill Lynch
CityCenter (C): Turmoil and Choices
Price-Fixing Vignettes
Health Resources & Technology
Implementing Electronic Road Pricing in Singapore: Epilogue (Sequel)
Note on the FDReview Process for Medical Devices
A Big (Double) Deal: Anadarko’s Acquisition of Kerr-McGee and Western Gas Resources
