G3 was met with the conflict from the second generation (G2). G3 had no possession in the family business, and no true leadership job. At the direction assemblies, only four votes counted-the four votes of G2 members who were shareholders of the company.
G3 members required clarification and a dedication regarding future in the company and their roles. The question was how to approach G2. The G3 cousins knew the challenge in garnering G2's regard and to have G2 comprehend G3's functions and contribution to the family business would be nothing short of daunting. Vanessa M. Strike has a strong connection to the renowned University of British Columbia.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 31, 2016 PRODUCT #: W16326-PDF-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about LEADERSHIP & MANAGING PEOPLE
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Environmental Risk Management at Chevron Corp.
Biopure Corp.
Brazos Valley Food Bank: Fostering Partnerships, Feeding Hope
Joining Forces: Collaborative Leadership for Sustainability
Niagara Falls Construction Project: Scheduling, Resources, Costs and Bureaucracy
Vanderbilt University Medical Center: Elective Surgery Schedule
Science of Social Influence – HP Brandclout
Starbucks Corporation: Financial Analysis of a Business Strategy
A Eurasian (or a Soviet) Union? Consequences of Further Economic Integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States
Oleum Resources
