Trust for Public Land Case Solution
How could TPLassess the findings to describe to the board of TPL if the results may not seem quite as great as they really were? Nevertheless, for the second year TPL had revealed a yearly deficit in its cash flow from operating activities of approximately $11 million.
As TPL continued to develop its actions to protect more land, McIntyre and Rogers had to inquire whether there might be pressure to get a temporary no-growth policy set up regarding property acquisitions. But if they did this, would potentially alienate donors, who'd been impressed by TPL's competitive plan of acreage acquisitions and they don't shield certain essential pieces of property? And was it truly needed? Instead, could TPL immediately bring the cash flow from operating activities into equilibrium as in preceding years and reinvigorate existing revenue flows?
This is just an excerpt. This case is about FINANCE & ACCOUNTING
PUBLICATION DATE: May 14, 2003
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Sephora Direct: Investing in Social Media Video and Mobile
Coca-Cola in 2011: In Search of a New Model
Deloitte Recommends Client Selection to Regency Bank
Carrefour China Building a Greener Store
Deutsche Allgemeinversicherung
The Whiz Kids
Wealth Management Crisis at UBS (A)
Reforming Social Security Around the World
Innocents Abroad: Currencies and International Stock Returns, Spanish Version
Structured Credit Index Products and Default Correlation
