This case and its companion case, "Dayton Foundry" (UVA-QA-0788), are a chain of negotiations, for which there is a narrow zone of potential agreement. Access to the results in this area is difficult due to differences in the cost of raw materials (real and perceived), potentially opening the extreme proposals, lack of commitment to doing business, and different interpretations of history. The difference in the cost of raw materials may provide opportunities for mutually beneficial agreements to be achieved. If you are upgrading "RMC: Hydra Division". (UVA-QA-0399) and "Akron Foundry" (UVA-QA-0398) contract in December 2011, and the data are in aluminum prices in 2010 and 2011 "Hide
by Sherwood C. Frey Source: Darden Business School, 7 pages. Publication date: April 30, 2012. Prod. #: UV6348-PDF-ENG
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Philip McCrea: Once an Entrepreneur … (B)
Work is Good: Branding the EmployAbility Mission
UpDown: Confidential Instructions for PHUC
DIENA
Great Expectations (A)
GE: We Bring Good Things to Life (A)
Note on the FDReview Process for Medical Devices
Cola Wars: Going Global
HOUSE OF QUALITY AT APPLE
UBS-ROGUE TRADER SCANDAL
