It's composed from the perspective of a new faculty member who's engaged in a decision making process enclosing the development of a points-based system designed to allocate merit pay. The process is compelling her to evaluate how she is structuring the apportionment of her work, which is changing her inspiration towards instructing a student case antagonism team. Edwards traditionally used a judgment-based approach to the allowance of value. The case scenario summarizes the rationale used in the design of the new points-based system, converses the potential advantages and pitfalls, and emphasizes the views of different stakeholders throughout the procedure, for example, union, the faculty and senior government at the university, college and department levels.
Thus has outlined fairly stringent standards for the awarding of value in the new collective agreement, the union is opposed to merit. Faculty opinion is blended encircling value more normally, as well as the execution of a points-based system versus a judgment-based system specifically. Senior university administration is devoted to the continuation of the merit system at the university as a tool to reward exceptional performance and to retain star faculty. The individual sections at Edwards are in the middle of finalizing the standards and processes for allocation of value-based pay. The protagonist is not certain about how her section will carry on in the design and allocation of points, and the way it's going to lead to her re allocating her work endeavors.
The Merit of a Points-based Merit System at the Edwards School of Business case study solution
PUBLICATION DATE: December 22, 2011 PRODUCT #: W11603-HCB-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about LEADERSHIP & MANAGING PEOPLE