After thinking about the situation in which the employee has given inaccurate information, thereby alienating the client, the senior partner of the audit firm ultimately decides not to take any action against the employee. By choosing not to create excitement within the company or between a company and its customers, partners now have to think about the consequences of the incident had on him personally. These cases give students the opportunity to evaluate the consequences of various courses of action in his career and personal life. See also the case (UV1343).
This Darden study. "Hide
by R. Edward Freeman, Jenny Mead Source: Darden School of Business 1 pages. Publication Date: 11 January 2006. Prod. #: UV1345-PDF-ENG
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Models of Corporate Governance: Whos the Fairest of Them All
WalMarts Sustainability Strategy
The IT Audit That Boosts Innovation
Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease
Grupo Martica
Arthur Andersen LLP
Facts and Figures on Defense Procurement: The Department of Defense and Defense Procurement An Overview
Coffee Wars in India: Café Coffee Day 2013
Flinders Valves and Controls Inc
North BancTec Incorporation
