The Knight Management Center Case Solution
There were a number of arguments for pursuing LEED accreditation. Initially, the GSB would take a management position in sustainability, which would teach trainees about the significance of the function of sustainability in service and work as a design for business neighborhood. It would likewise offer the GSB a competitive advantage in drawing in trainees to the school.
In addition to the included expense of making the school LEED accredited, which was believed to be around $11 million, however was really difficult to approximate, Joss needed to consider the varying viewpoints of the school's professors, alumni, trainees and administration. While a number of the school's alumni and trainees favored the accreditation, professors had the tendency to protest it. Stanford's administration was extremely versus pursuing LEED accreditation.
The Dean of the Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB), Bob Joss, should choose whether to make the school's brand-new school LEED accredited. LEED represents Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design and was an ecological accreditation granted by the U.S. Green Building Council. LEED was a system where jobs made points for pleasing particular green structure requirements.
There were likewise arguments versus pursuing LEED accreditation. Would the ecological issues be put ahead of useful everyday functional performance, which include having enough light and cooling? Some felt that the LEED system itself was flawed, with a stiff point system, which they thought counted small ecological enhancements instead of genuine ones. Likewise, Stanford's government said that the school had its own set of durability requirements which were stringent, yet more fit for school structures than the LEED system.
This is just an excerpt. This case is about Business