Question 1

From the perspective of the actors given in the precise scenario, it has been determined that there are sudden conflicts among the three most highlighted players named as Eden, Johnson, and Abraham working on the specific project in Sturdivant Electric Corporation at that particular period.The. company had the operations of controlling the communications equipment as well as  developing the computer systems in a well-planned manner whose purpose was to be used under pressure by the armed forces.

However, those particular players working on the new project haddifferent job responsibilities as well as roles to perform invarious manners. Thus, to elaborate the role of these players, a particular cause of supervision is subjected to changing behavior as well as working under pressure. Therefore, Eden was the chief of computer design unit of Sturdivant. Johnson was the supervisor of the project facility criteria and Abraham was the head of computer programming department.

So, all these players had adifferent role to perform in the unified project requirement. In addition to that, there were many conflicts that were raised between these players due to unmatched behaviors according to the job role. Each participant in the project has been analyzed by his/her personality and ability to contribute towards the project’s objective.

Sturdivant Electric Corporation Harvard Case Solution & Analysis2

The role and qualities of Bill Eden over the project

With the sudden role performed by Bill Eden (A 42 years old professional of computer design department), it has been identified that he was serving as the potential blood of the project to achieve particular objectives by focusing more on the controls of computer designing department.Under the analysis of the personality of Eden, it shows that he was a straight forward person and doesn’t allow to bear any favoritism to a particular work. So, when he saw an augmented friendship between his boss and the related assistant of the Department, he left the job because of their favoritism tactics which were applied to their project.

In this particular job and his assigned goal, he was focusing to meet the precise requirements of Army testing implementation in a best possible way. With a straight forward personality, his position described him as a boss of the departmental workers instead of a colleague. So, due to this role, Abraham was not satisfied enough to work with him as Eden hadreliable power over him.

Also, Eden was not getting the proper response of Abraham to contribute towards the project’s objective. He was rude in a sense that the coworkers started to delay the deadlines for the work to be done on atimely basis. Thus, with all these certain issues, it has been analyzed that Eden failed to communicate with Abraham and other talented workers of the project effectively. Under the circumstances of work pressure, he was not familiar on how to share work to reduce the burden, rather than forcing the workers to work with minimum support.

Conflicts arise through Abraham’s behavior

Abraham was junior to Eden because his experience was two years less than Eden. However, his position clearly shows that the level he got was matched with the standard of Eden to contribute towards the army project. Abraham was an energetic person who met the deadlines at the particular period and interested in a flexible working pattern.....................

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

Fat Debate on Big Food Unraveling Blogosphere Reactions Kingdee in 2011: Stranding or Dormancy Caesars Entertainment: CodeGreen Red Hen Baking Company Intellectual Asset Valuation Corona Beer Genzyme Center (C) HubSpot: Dharmesh Shah, Founder, Video Netflix in China The Pepsi Ultimate Taste Challenge 2012