Somalia's Volatile Politics and the Ethics of Engagement Case Solution
The case broadens its buddy case, "Al-Shabaab, Gatekeepers, and the Ethics of Humanitarian Help" (ETH-1), from the level of individual-within-organization to the level of organization-within-political system. The alarming requirement for humanitarian help to Somalia's numerous countless internally displaced persons (IDPs) was puzzled due to the existence of a federal government that appeared hopelessly weak. Unstable governmental organizations produced a power vacuum mainly filled by Al-Shabaab, a jihadist group with geo-political and spiritual aspirations. The ailments demanded by Al-Shabaab gatekeepers and their senior pioneers (shura) led to the expulsion of numerous NGOs from Somalia. Their hesitant exit left numerous other humanitarian help companies to consider whether "working out with terrorists" deserved it when such settlements perpetuated the system of corruption, injustice, and physical threat.
Knowing Goal
The case contributes to class conversations about long- versus short-term expenses and advantages of "handling the devil" or choosing not to accomplish this (implicitly, a practical method). With either of these choices, a secondary style is regardless if humanitarian help companies have an ethical obligation to take favorable activities to alter corrupt systems -- within this circumstances by assisting in the advancement of steady and receptive political organizations (perhaps, a Rawlsian method).
This is just an excerpt. This case is about Business