Sinking of the Vasa Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Sinking of the Vasa Case Solution

Hence by analyzing the needs of the overall customers to the Vasa Project, it can be deduced that the emphasis on pleasing the king was the prime concern of the customers, as it could have led to more profits, factors and continuous support. It was due to the fact that in times of monarchies, the ultimate power remained in the hands of the king and pleasing the king was the only way to retain profits. However, such approach and system led to major problems as occurred to Vasa. Since the shipwright took the orders from the management, and worked as the king ordered without explaining the design complexities, it led to the failure of the ship (Std., 1998).

Moreover, it is important to ponder that literature and practical are two different aspects of work, since the thing possible theoretically cannot be put in action immediately. This can be seen from the case of Vasa, in which lack of technical knowledge and information made the king to order for two gun spots, and a larger ship, leading to poor structure and ultimately disaster (Henry Petroski, 1992).

Though it has been understood that the shipwright and the ship builder had the ultimate information of the design, per gap, it can be said that the miscommunication would have occurred in the system, leading to poor design and overall structure. Lastly, the gradual orders of the king to increase the size of the ship led to poor understanding of the ship building, since the base of the ship was the main structural part, the gradual demand to increase the ship zone led to poor balance of the ship, making it sink in the sea.

How I identified the Needs

Well, I identified the needs by understanding the position of each of the individuals in the case. Since it is clear that the king’s position was to maintain power and lead, it can be clearly understood that he wanted to win the war by hook or crook. Similar was the case with the shipwright, who needed to manage the profits and the relationship with the king in order to maintain the favor in the long-term. Lastly, as the people, it is clear that each county or set of people wants its country to win and the sense of patriotism is present in the public. Hence such considerations are kept in mind while understanding the needs of the customers.

Lessons Learnt

Following are the lessons learnt from the Vasa Project:

The king changed the orders frequently during the war, the lesson learnt from this is that the indecisiveness of the leaders led to poor planning, leading to confusion.
The death of Henrik Hybertson in 1627, outlines the lesson that the presence of a potential team member is important to pursue a project, and hence it is important for the organization to plan for the loss pre-hand and develop such system that reduces dependence on human (VyKett, 1999).
Since there are no known factors for calculating stability and stiffness and gravity, it gives the lesson of having proper measurement and tools in order to excel in the market (Stockholm, 2000).
The stability test was conducted in the initial period of the ship building. This outlines the lesson that the management should continuously check and measure the system in order to reduce loopholes and improve the weak areas (Vasamuseet, 1996).

Modern Day application

Following are the lessons that can be implemented on the modern corporations:

The indecisive nature of the leader leads to unnecessary problem and confusions, leading to poor management. This depicts that the offered organization should be flexible and firm in decision making process in order to cope up with the changing situation in the market. It outlines that it is important for the organization to develop the flexible strategy in order to absorb the market changes effectively (Franzen, 1974).
The second lesson which is learned is the loss of the team member and its impact. It can be applied to the time of incorporation, when the organization relies on the human power and expertise and knowledge to develop the product and services. This should not be case, in fact the organization should develop the information management systems that can collect the information and maintain it within the organization. By doing so product development won’t be affected even if the individual leaves the organization (Sandstrom, 1995).
The third application: it is important for the organization to develop certain bench marks and the measurement criteria, in order to measure the reliability and stability of the products and services. Moreover, the beta testing of the products should be pursued to reduce the chances of default in the main market (Fairley, 2000) (Stobe, 2012)
The fourth implementation for the modern corporation is that it is important for the origination to continually test the products in the market. It is due to the fact that continuous testing reduces the chances of defaults and the identification of the weak areas is expedited, leading to proper handling of the projects (Oster, 2008).

How I identified the Needs

Lessons Learnt

Following are the lessons learnt from the Vasa Project:

The king changed the orders frequently during the war, the lesson learnt from this is that the indecisiveness of the leaders led to poor planning, leading to confusion.
The death of Henrik Hybertson in 1627, outlines the lesson that the presence of a potential team member is important to pursue a project, and hence it is important for the organization to plan for the loss pre-hand and develop such system that reduces dependence on human (VyKett, 1999).
Since there are no known factors for calculating stability and stiffness and gravity, it gives the lesson of having proper measurement and tools in order to excel in the market (Stockholm, 2000).
The stability test was conducted in the initial period of the ship building. This outlines the lesson that the management should continuously check and measure the system in order to reduce loopholes and improve the weak areas (Vasamuseet, 1996).

Modern Day application

Following are the lessons that can be implemented on the modern corporations:

The indecisive nature of the leader leads to unnecessary problem and confusions, leading to poor management. This depicts that the offered organization should be flexible and firm in decision making process in order to cope up with the changing situation in the market. It outlines that it is important for the organization to develop the flexible strategy in order to absorb the market changes effectively (Franzen, 1974).
The second lesson which is learned is the loss of the team member and its impact. It can be applied to the time of incorporation, when the organization relies on the human power and expertise and knowledge to develop the product and services. This should not be case, in fact the organization should develop the information management systems that can collect the information and maintain it within the organization. By doing so product development won’t be affected even if the individual leaves the organization (Sandstrom, 1995).
The third application: it is important for the organization to develop certain bench marks and the measurement criteria, in order to measure the reliability and stability of the products and services. Moreover, the beta testing of the products should be pursued to reduce the chances of default in the main market (Fairley, 2000) (Stobe, 2012)
The fourth implementation for the modern corporation is that it is important for the origination to continually test the products in the market. It is due to the fact that continuous testing reduces the chances of defaults and the identification of the weak areas is expedited, leading to proper handling of the projects (Oster, 2008).

Conclusion

It is important for the organization to understand the nature of the product and the technicalities in order to make the product successful in the market. The blind testing of the products cannot be pursued in the modern markets, since it causes the company to lose a great deal of money and also brings negative reputation, making it vulnerable in the market.

Lessons Learnt

Following are the lessons learnt from the Vasa Project:

The king changed the orders frequently during the war, the lesson learnt from this is that the indecisiveness of the leaders led to poor planning, leading to confusion.
The death of Henrik Hybertson in 1627, outlines the lesson that the presence of a potential team member is important to pursue a project, and hence it is important for the organization to plan for the loss pre-hand and develop such system that reduces dependence on human (VyKett, 1999).
Since there are no known factors for calculating stability and stiffness and gravity, it gives the lesson of having proper measurement and tools in order to excel in the market (Stockholm, 2000).
The stability test was conducted in the initial period of the ship building. This outlines the lesson that the management should continuously check and measure the system in order to reduce loopholes and improve the weak areas (Vasamuseet, 1996).

Modern Day application

Following are the lessons that can be implemented on the modern corporations:

The indecisive nature of the leader leads to unnecessary problem and confusions, leading to poor management. This depicts that the offered organization should be flexible and firm in decision making process in order to cope up with the changing situation in the market. It outlines that it is important for the organization to develop the flexible strategy in order to absorb the market changes effectively (Franzen, 1974).
The second lesson which is learned is the loss of the team member and its impact. It can be applied to the time of incorporation, when the organization relies on the human power and expertise and knowledge to develop the product and services. This should not be case, in fact the organization should develop the information management systems that can collect the information and maintain it within the organization. By doing so product development won’t be affected even if the individual leaves the organization (Sandstrom, 1995).
The third application: it is important for the organization to develop certain bench marks and the measurement criteria, in order to measure the reliability and stability of the products and services. Moreover, the beta testing of the products should be pursued to reduce the chances of default in the main market (Fairley, 2000) (Stobe, 2012)
The fourth implementation for the modern corporation is that it is important for the origination to continually test the products in the market. It is due to the fact that continuous testing reduces the chances of defaults and the identification of the weak areas is expedited, leading to proper handling of the projects (Oster, 2008).

Conclusion

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.