Case Summary

Explain the key facts of the case.

The city of Boston had applied to host the nominating convention for the Democratic party residential and it did it to bring economic benefit and prestige to the city. The convention was however, subject to tightest measures for protection and security as a result of the events that had occurred in September, 11, 2001.

As a result of the security planning, a number of roads and the key sections of the city had been shut down and this had engendered complaints from the business owners and the citizens alike. This case explains the story of security planning for the Democratic party residential and highlights the measures taken by the officials to balance the expectations of security concerns about terrorist threats and civic celebration. Around more than 20 local governments, state and federal agencies had convened to plan the security of Democratic National Conventional.

This was the first major political event post the 9/11 attacks. Therefore, the lead responsibility for security planning was handed over to the Secret Service and its agent, Scott Sheafe had taken over the role of coordinator for all the security arrangements. This event had taken place between July 26-29 in 2004. Boston had budgeted $ 10 million for the security of DNC in its bid. This collaboration was highly successful because of the close participation of all the agencies that were involved in security planning.

Security Planning for the 2004 Democratic National Convention Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Case Analysis

How is the case affected by organizational dynamics, positively or negatively?

To a large extent, the case for the security planning of the Democratic National Convention in 2004 is positively affected by the organizational dynamics. For instance, Sheafe was the lead coordinator and despite starting from scratch in Boston, he had the benefit of organizing the procedure that secret service headquarters had established previously.

Apart from this, the core strategy employed by Sheafe was to form partnerships with the public safety agencies, security agencies and the other law enforcement agencies. The group developed for the steering committee encompassed the 11 heads of different agencies among these. Sheafe also introduced himself to the key officials whose cooperation would be must needed for the success of security planning for this event.

Boston is a small city and the interdependence of the public safety agencies and the law enforcement agencies had helped a lot to handle the security of such a large event like Democratic National Convention in 2004 and this had helped to build positive relationships. All the organizations were already motivated for strong security plan as this was a post September 11 event. This was the reason due to which the agency leaders were included for greater effectiveness.

How does role perception and attribution affect the outcome?

Role perception and attribution are strong phenomena that define the success or failure of any outcome. In the case of Democratic National Convention event, role perception and attribution had positively and strongly contributed to the success of the event. All the subcommittee and committee leaders strongly felt the benefits of working together in a small community of the public safety and law enforcement agencies...........

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

Marketing Analysis Toolkit: Market Size and Market Share Analysis Organization and Strategy at Millennium (B) Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund (B) New Wachovia (A) Malaysia Airlines (A) Drypers Corporation Analysis of Ferrovial Conquering BAA From LBO to IPO: How to Take Neopost Public on the First French Market (A) Entreprenuership And Innovation Management Apple Future: Apple Watch Apple Tv And/Or Apple Car