This case relies upon Qualcomm shareholders' 2012 Say-on- Pay vote and the dispute between direction and the Institutional Shareholder Services concerning the appropriateness of the CEO's compensation plan.
Was the ISS right that benchmarking to aspirational peers exaggerated and justified Qualcomm CEO's pay? Or was management correct that its CEO's pay is justified by Qualcomm's current business performance?
Say on Pay Qualcomm, Inc. Shareholders Vote 'Maybe' in 2012 case study solution
PUBLICATION DATE: July 08, 2013 PRODUCT #: 114005-HCB-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about FINANCE & ACCOUNTING
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
UFID(A)
Back to the Future: Redeveloping Unilever House
Financing Higher Education in Australia
Tennant Company
Miami Car Care Center Inc.
Running Head: Massachusetts Financial Service
Making Investment Decisions Financial Management
FinSAS Financial Research: Financial Data and SAS Programming
Premier Explosives: Finance for Organic Growth
Don’t (Just) Chart Your Financial Future
