Mitch Daniels and the State of Indiana Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Governor of the State of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, knew he had to make a tough choice as he sat in his office in December 2010. Should he aggressively drive the state legislature to pass comprehensive education reform-a leading priority of his administration-or, instead, push for a new "right-to-work" law that he considered might be crucial to enhancing his state's competitiveness? He was concerned that he wouldn't be able to do both during his second period.

Mitch Daniels and the State of Indiana Case Study Solution

He prided himself on being able to work with both Republicans and Democrats in the state legislature. In the elections of autumn 2010, the Republicans regained control of the Indiana House of Representatives. Passage of a right-to-work law was not a major element of their election platform because of the union resistance they thought it'd generate. Gently, yet, a right was supported by Republicans -to-work law which was anticipated to bring more jobs to the state in an exceedingly challenging economic environment. As he considered which initiative to pursue, Daniels had to weigh the political ramifications. He knew that despite his various accomplishments, his legacy would be likely impacted by this pick as governor. Daniels started to jot down notes about the tradeoffs concerning his various options as he weighed the selection.

PUBLICATION DATE: October 01, 2013 PRODUCT #: 414049-PDF-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT