This case is a follow-up of the Mistry Architects: Innovating for Sustainability (A) (Case 609-044). In the Case (A) Sharukh and Renu Mistry discovered and run an architectural company committed to being both ecologically accountable and client-oriented. The case utilizes a hard design choice in a tsunami rehab task to show the obstacles dealt with by expert services companies, and the function of development in satisfying the requirements of numerous stakeholders.
Mistry Architects (B) Case Study Solution
The particular design choice is making an option in between thatch roofings which are eco-friendly, versus strengthened cement concrete roofings that the villagers desire for its capability. Case (B) discusses the company and exposes's option, while explaining how the neighborhood restores itself after the tsunami, in addition to how the companies develops. A (C) case talks about the future strategies of the company consisting of development and succession problems.
PUBLICATION DATE: February 17, 2009 PRODUCT #: 609064-PDF-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about INNOVATION & ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Acknowledging religious diversity: Opportunities and challenges
San Leon Energy: Hydraulic Fracturing in Poland
Corporate Reform Elements of the Dodd-Frank Act
Repositioning CARE USA
Real Property Negotiation Game: Seller Raleigh Commons (B)
Louis Gerstner and Lotus Development (C)
Dell Ventures
Anthem Incorporation
Case Analysis: Foulke Consumer Products: the Southeast Region
Product Safety and Preemptive Recalls
