Madelien Careau And The Montreal Symphony Orchestra Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Madelien Careau And The Montreal Symphony Orchestra Case Study Help

Furthermore, the electric bicycle could not yield the specified measures such as distance covered per mile, fuelused per mile as expected or the fuel shortage along with an ineffective battery life. In order to prevent form all those risks from occuring, Renaldis recommended that he should first use this car in his city first, because it will give him an idea about the effectiveness of the product an d he would analyze that the car is working according to his expected set measures.

Question: 4 (a)

Project Stakeholders

Project stakeholders are those people, who are directly or indirectly related to the organization or benefiting or gain advantage form the organization. In this case of OSM, the number of project stakeholders had been discussed in detail below:

Lucien Bouchard was a former prime minister and now working as a Chairman of the board of directors of Orchestra. He helped Madeleine for resolving conflict between the employees, with the help of proper negotiation settlement.

Helene Desmarais was the President and the Executive Chairman of the board of director of the OSMfoundation. She helped Madeleine in wayby collecting pledges and donations for the OSM foundation totaling $40 million.

Monique Jerome- Forget was the supporter of OSM and was a former Charestcabinet’s president of Treasury Board. He helped OSM ina way by making strong arguments in the Ministry council for construction of Symphonic Address.

Kent Nagano was newly appointed as a conductor for the project and assumed to perform all difficult tasks. In addition to this, Jacques Lacombe was the assistant of Madeleineand was temporarily appointed as a project’s conductor after the resignation of Charles Dutoit.

Power/ Interest Matrix

The power and interest matrix areperformed in orderto examine the shareholder’s type and interest by making shareholders mapping. Lucien Bouchard and Helene Desmarais could lie under the A category (Manage closely) because their strong interest and powers. While, Monique Jerome could be lied under the B category (keep satisfied) and Kent Nagano could be lie under D category (Monitor), where minimal efforts required.

Question: 4 (b)

Communication Strategy

Primary, every stakeholderwasworking as a separate stakeholderand contributing their parts in different difficult situations. Each stakeholder negotiated the issue with Madeleine and respond accordingly.

Proposed strategy

It is recommended that the Madeleine should implement an advanced communication strategy with all stakeholders in order to engage them all t one place. Different communication channel could be used such as face to faceinteraction, which allows each stakeholder to express his or her views clearly. In addition to this, if it is difficult to meet at one place, they can use advance communication tools such as virtual meeting place, which allow them to communicate with each other on computers.

Reasons for the Proposed Strategy

With the help of above proposedstrategy, the organization and stakeholders could avail the following benefits and thus lead to choose this strategy:

This strategy could enable them to focus on main issue, rather than each other.
A compelling problem resolution could be made, when one or two people express their experiences andregards.

This would generate creatively and innovation in the decisions, while allowing space to others to express openly.............................

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.