Hammer Bank Group: Micro-View of a Mega-Merger Case Solution
Abstract:
Following 2 essential acquisitions in 1995, Hammer Bank Group had actually made no effort to combine these entities into its own operations till 1997, and just minimal development by 2000. This case explains the disputes and resistance to combination through the contrasting point of views of 4 main stars while doing so: the outdoors specialist worked with to execute the combination, and the heads of the 3 financing departments whose operations were targeted for functional combination.
Pedagogical Goals:
At the micro-level, it produces conversation about the interaction of cultures and characters in terms of settlement, impact and power, hierarchy and control, and that interaction s effect on the combination procedure and results. Due to the fact that the combination was later on reversed (consisted of in the Mentor Note), the case likewise serves as the basis for going over conditions under which combination is tough or not even preferable.
This is just an excerpt. This case is about Technology and Operations Management
published: 01 Jan 2003
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Shouldice Hospital Ltd. (Abridged)
Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES
Strategic Entrepreneurship in Emerging Market Multinationals: Marco Polo Marine
Wal-Mart Update 2011
The Exxon Valdez Revisited: The Untold Story (B) Epilogue
Transformational Outsourcing
STMicroelectronics E-Chain Optimization Project: Achieving Streamlined Operations Through Collaborative Forecasting and Inventory Management
Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd.
SKF Bearings Series: Market Orientation Through Services (B): The Mission and Customer Strategy
Air Products and Chemicals Inc.: MIS Reorganization (A)
