Decision on the adoption of new technologies in health care is only the first step in implementing the trip. While some of the new technologies are easily reached by those who should use them, most of them have met with some resistance. In some cases, members of the various groups - including administrators, doctors, and technicians - have to work together for new technologies to effectively capture, becoming incorporated into the daily practice of the organization. This article reports on a qualitative study hospitals adopting a new technology for minimally invasive cardiac surgery, they found significant differences in the two approaches and implementation success. Four case studies illustrate different, silent frames belonging to the leaders of each of the project and how these impact on the team learning process and, in turn, the implementation success. "Hide
by Amy C. Edmondson Source: California Management Review 23 pages. Publication Date: January 1, 2003. Prod. #: CMR247-PDF-ENG
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis
COFCO Xinjiang Tunhe Co. Ltd.
XenSource (C)
Check Point Software Technologies: The Continual Building of a Global Technology Company
Pacific Bell: Centrex Reengineering
Puritan Drug Co.
The Acer Group: Building an Asian Multinational
Carrefour in Asia (A) – Taiwan: A Bridgehead into Asia Award winner Prize Winner
Safety First in China?
The Second Stage Expressway System (SES) in Bangkok
