Exam Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Exam Case Study Analysis

JSCP

Geographic Combatant Commander uses JSPC for the translation of strategic approach guide and directs into planning for the theater strategic approach in different ways. The facilitation of comprehensive planning tasks and considerations for campaigns, contingencies, and posture plans are by JPSC. It significantly specifies variations in plans that are mainly required for contingency plans. Furthermore, the Geographic Combatant Commander uses JPSC for the translation of end-state policies of strategy from the GEF into the contingency guidance plans and campaigns of the military.(Vego, 2009)Additionally, it significantly leads to the expansion of guidance which mainly consists of security cooperation in association with other steady-state activities. The ability of the Geographic Commander associated with the translation of strategic guidanceand providing direction into planning for theater strategy is followed by the establishment of strategic regional and functional end-states in context to the federal government of the United States and NSS through JPSC.

In the context of strategy formulation, the questions of feasibility, acceptability, and suitability are questions about the validity of a given strategy. In your own words, briefly define the concepts of feasibility, acceptability, and suitability.

Feasibility

It is mainly concerned with whether or not the organization has the capabilities and resources required for the efficient delivery of a strategy i.e. working efficiency in practice. The analysis of feasibility mainly includes the evaluation of financial feasibility by performing a break-even analysis, funds flow forecasting, and deployment of resources – optimization and utilization of resources within the organization.

Acceptability

It is mainly concerned with the identification of expected outcomes of the performance of strategic options. The analysis criteria of Acceptability is based on three factors i.e. return (cost-benefit, profitability – DCF, ROC, and Payback period,shareholder value analysis), risk (sensitivity analysis, financial ratios projections), and stakeholder reactions.

Suitability

It is mainly concerned with the evaluation of the alternatives regarding whether they address the key issues related to the organizational strategic position or not. It is primarily based on three factors i.e. expectations, capabilities, and environment. It can be analysedthrough the usage of techniques, such as:stakeholder mapping, PESTLE, Porter Five Forces, Value Chain, and others. (Wills, 2002)

Using the USEUCOM Theater Strategy from Lesson C205, describe how EUCOM is accomplishing the first theater priority of "Deter Russian aggression."

Considering ‘Deter Russian Aggression’ among all the six theater priorities, some of the common security approaches were supported by Russia against counternarcotic and counterterrorism. Such contributions are overshadowed by its disregard for the neighbours’sovereignty in Europe and violation of various agreements representing the requirement for Russia to perform actions within international norms. The objective of the national military of the United States is to deter the state adversaries from threatening the homeland and interests of the United States while assuring the allies' security.

Because NATO allies and partners are threatened by the Russian Aggression in Europe, the leading DoD (Department of Defense) –EUCOM of the United States'efforts for deterring further actions of Russia in terms of destabilizing the regional security. EUCOM in the United States tends to work with partners and allies by Operation Atlantic Resolve for deterring the Russian Aggression in the region of Eastern Europe. The participation of EUCOM in the United States in other multilateral and bilateral exercises and engagements are known for the provision of support to mission in terms of assuring and defending NATO. It also enhancespartners and allies to develop the ability to providesecurity and counter the use of asymmetric, irregular, and conventional warfare of Russia.

USEUCOM is expected to work with the Joint Staff, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and other combatant commands to make sure that deterrence efforts of collective Department of Defense are synchronized and are achieving the desired effect without any impact over the provocation or an unwarranted escalation. (Breedlove, 2015)

What is the purpose of a Combatant Commanders Annual Posture Statement to Congress?

The combatant commander’s annual posture statement is an unclassified summary of the accomplishment programs, plans, roles, and the mission of the army which are published with core consideration to provide the valuable information to the US senate members. Additionally, the annual posture statement tends to describe and assess what the army has done over a period of time, with an intent of supporting the national defense strategy and plans.

In addition to this, the annual posture statement is the written testimonial of the Chief of Staff of the Army and the Secretary of Army submitted to Congress on an annual basis. The posture statement is viewed by Congress to get informed about the state of the Army and it outlines the priorities, initiatives as well as the accomplishments of the Army for Congress to consider while examining or reviewing the budget of the president, for the upcoming fiscal year.(Army, 2005).

Furthermore, the Posture Statement describes the vision of the Army for the provision of the ready forces and provide Congress as well as external and internal audiences, the overview of the plan of the Army to build the readiness. The Posture statement is considered an authoritative document that tends to stress over the significance of the Army’s enduring as well as valuable contributions to the defense of the country, its vision for the future, and the global commitment (Staff, 2016). By explaining the budgetary needs of the Army, the unclassified summary helps the Army in maintaining the strategic priorities in the upcoming fiscal year................................

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.