One regrettable effect of the concentration on "charming," "transformational," and "visionary" leader habits throughout the previous couple of years has actually been the propensity to reduce the value that transactional leadership habits carry leadership efficiency. We state that this is regrettable due to the fact that current research study has actually revealed that transactional leadership, through contingent reward and punishment habits, can have considerable results on a range of vital worker mindsets, understandings, and steps of task efficiency.
In this post we go over some possible factors why transactional leadership has actually been delegated to a lower function than transformational leadership, sum up the research study that shows the value of leader contingent reward and punishment behavior to leadership efficiency, and determine some of the systems that these types of leadership behavior work through to affect staff member mindsets and habits. Following this, we resolve 10 misconceptions supervisors typically have concerning the administration of penalties and benefits, and offer some suggestions about how leaders can enhance their efficiency in administering acknowledgment and discipline in organizational settings.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 15, 2010 PRODUCT #: BH388-HCB-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about LEADERSHIP & MANAGING PEOPLE
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Communication Essentials for Female Executives to Develop Leadership Presence: Getting Beyond the Barriers of Understating Accomplishment
SMRT Trains – Managing Operations and Service Quality
Gerry Pasciucco at AIG Financial Products (A)
Women on boards of directors: Why skirts in seats aren’t enough
And Now The Hard Part: Role-Plays
K2: Brotherhood of the Rope (B)
Performance Indicator
Infosys: Financing an Indian Software Start-Up, Chinese Version
Avon Products China (A)
Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy
