Question 01: What does Heidegger mean by autochthony and why calculative thought disrupts mankind’s autochthony in his view?
The meaning of autochthony as per Martin Heidegger has been the fact that people generally believe that the use of technology supports and eases the decision making. In Heidegger’s opinion,autochthony is the perception which people have built regarding the use of innovation and technology.
He believes that the over dependence on technology and calculative thoughts have limited the decision making of individual. The impact of calculative thought has restricted people to think beyond what they see. They have tangled themselves in thinking about those aspects that are evident and tangible. Meditative thinking or looking beyond the imagination is something that has been disappeared and the overall process of thought process is one dimensional.
Calculative thought disrupts humans autochthony because with the calculative thought, a person does not have the capacity to involve himself into activities that can bring the change. He generally focuses on the things that can bring the element of ease and comfort. Calculative thought does disrupt in Heidegger’s view because it is the failure of the person in restricting the thought process and presenting themselves to the calculative thoughts rather than being more meditative in thinking.
Question 02: What is Heidegger’s solution to the problem of calculative/technological thought?
Martin Heidegger’s solution to the issue of calculative/technological thought is to answer it with “because”. The reason is simple, under technological or the calculative thought, one has to answer the question or the query with “because”, because it actually answers the purpose of the calculative or the technological thought.
Fundamentally as per Martin Heidegger, he believes that technology and investing in increasing the technology is a positive thing; however it needs to be explained. As he quotes an example in his book, where the questions why are the nuclear weapons developed, he answered it with “because”. This actually helps and convinces the person because he needs to be informed about the positivity of the particular technology.
Moreover, every new technology is an innovation and the people do not know the purpose of its use, therefore, the person who invents it needs to educate the people about its advantages and disadvantages simultaneously. This would help them in overcoming the issue of calculative/technological thoughts.
Along with this, Heidegger also believes that to resolve the issue of calculative/technological thought, one has to be proactive and has to focus on meditative thoughts also. Until meditative thoughts are not included, the results or the outcome of calculative thoughts cannot be in favor of the people because eventually one has to focus on building the meditative thoughts that can lead to better execution of calculative and technological thoughts.
Question 03
Heidegger is quite right with his observation that although the advent of technology has been to support the humans and to actually make their tasks faster, the results have been rather opposite. In the modern era, people use technology such as cell-phone, internet and iPod to waste time.
Although the basic purpose of technology was to serve the humanity make them save time to think about the more thoughtful contemplation and engage themselves in meditation, however the results have been opposite. People have been using technology for all the wrong purpose where the most obvious issue is the over usage of cell phone, iPod and internet which has limited the activities of people.
Discourse on Thinking, by Martin Heidegger Case Solution
Heidegger is actually good with his observation because in the past before the advent of the above stated technologies people had more time to think about other things which made them bring out the best in them. Things have changed and the technology has been a harmful induction in human life because it has been exploited in the entire negative manner.
Heidegger has stated the fact that the use of technology should be restricted and it should be limited because if people will use technology with such intensity and frequency, then they cannot think about the other aspects of human life.
Moreover, the element of laziness has also prevailed where humans have become rather slow. Therefore, the opinion of Heidegger is quite accurate and his observation is quite correct where he believes technology has been a method of wasting time and killing it intentionally...................
This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
PluroGen Therapeutics
Why Implementing Corporate Innovation is So Difficult
A Tale of Two Turnarounds at EDS: The Jordan Rules
Baltic Beverages Holding: Competing in a Globalizing World (A)
IDEO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Strategic audit of Sony Corporation
Philip Morris- Project Valuation
Disturbed Sensory (Auditory) Perception
Culture – USA
Managing Innovation at Nypro, Inc.
