Introduction
The CIO of Hardcore Financial Bank should implement an integrated approach in order to cater her decision regarding the selection of the new software and to mitigate the resistance that is becoming highly challenging from the developers.
Background
The chief information officer of the Hardcore Financial Bank, Jennifer Fenton is considering to implement new software in the organization due to the needs of the organization and the business environment in order to enhance the functionality of the process. However, during her research she has come across various new designs of software with different feature and unique in their own perspective.
Her major concern is that she has two impressive and efficient options available and he has to choose one of them, but the decision is quite critical to be made.The reasons that she has to consider while making the decision are also important to address and on the other hand, the need of the new software is also inevitable for the company.
The company has been witnessing rapid growth, which is why it has to develop new and innovative ideas, concepts and methodologies to sustain their growth. Besides that the company has been continuously involved in business development and is entering new businesses rapidly and steadily that asks for new methodologies and IT models to be implemented in order to cope with the challenges that are expected to emerge.
Furthermore, the company has an in-house software development facility or the user interface is present that requires the new software to be acceptable and manageable and requires approval from the development team. The development team has a contradictory statement as far as the software development is concerned and the research she has carried out in the meanwhile.
The two new ideas include either implementing Capability Maturity model which is widely suggested by the industry experts, but is extremely opposed by the in-house developers or to use an agile method that is considered as convenient and applied by the team. The company has large systems and the software must have the ability to cater for these larger systems and must adopt the strength that it possesses.
The software that has the capacity and strength of adjusting in these large systems of the organization is the major consideration point for the Jennifer before she makes a final decision regarding the software.However, before deciding on the selection of the software there are some other related issues that must be addressed.
The company’s major competitive advantage lies in their software systems that have contributed significantly to the overall success and growth of the company. Therefore, it is important to select the software that will help the company in maintaining its image and reputation and will sustain the competitive advantage as well by serving in the same direction.
Furthermore, it has been identified that lost in competitive advantage often results in declining growth of the company which is why this point becomes more significant to address. Therefore, the CIO is in real consideration about the selection of the software as it should serve the company as a source of competitive advantage.Cmm Versus Agile Methadology Wars In Software Development Case Solution
However, there are some secondary issues associated with the decision as Jennifer is considering implementing CMM or Capability Maturity Model but the implementation or the development of this software is opposed by many. The reason she is in favor of introducing this model is the strong support from the industry experts and their opinions about the software that sounds like strong recommendation.Methadology Wars In Software Development Case Solution
However, a threat revolves around that talks about the failure and as the development is quite an expensive process, the failure will result in real loss that will make the financial position of the company quite weak. Furthermore, another cost related issue is the over-budgeting as the estimated budget often cross the limit that will also incur costs, which will make the project development expensive without any firm guarantee of return on investment.
Furthermore, the decision is highly opposed by the in-house developers as they consider this software as inappropriate and informal and threatens to quit the company if the software is implemented or developed in-house. Besides that they believe that the systems need to be matured in order to develop this software which is not possible in the current scenario. Therefore, all these issues are strongly making the decision more complex for Jennifer.................
This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
America Latina Logistica
Note on LBO Capital Structure, Module Note
The High-Yield Debt Market
Omega Research Institute
Financial Investment Analysis Project
Director Infra Structure And Energy Segments
Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam)
Corporate Valuation and Market Multiples
Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures, Spanish Version
The Siam Commercial Bank: Weathering the Asian Storm (B)
