The case is set in the financial services industry during the fiscal disaster of 2008/09 and discusses issues when deciding on "reasonable" compensation packages for both senior management as well as risk managers.
When the institution is showing a reduction/accepting government money to survive, how can banks warrant multimillion dollar bonuses to top management? Can settlement packages please both investors and employees at different periods of the cycle and be competitive? The case emphasize the business's soul searching and attempt to conciliate an indignant public and manage potential future pressure scenarios better.
PUBLICATION DATE: June 30, 2009 PRODUCT #: INS101-HCB-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about STRATEGY about STRATEGY & EXECUTION
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
China Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research: Building a sustainable globally integrated research enterprise
Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China
Foreign Direct Investment and Irelands Tiger Economy (B)
Systems Infrastructure at Google (B)
ConAgra Inc.: Across the Food Chain
The Upside of Messiness: Clumsy Solutions for Wicked Problems
Balanced Workplace Flexibility: Avoiding the Traps
Negotiating with the Cuban Sugar Industry (A): No Way Out?
Strategy Formulation Paper
Nancheng Glass Works (B)
