Beginning in 1994, a series of articles and public disclosures signaled that Swiss banks might have kept assets belonging to victims of the Holocaust, and also could have engaged in long-term efforts to block survivors' ability to recover those assets after the Second World War.
Stuart Eizenstat, a longtime government administrator, and the U.S. Special Envoy for Property Restitution, assumed a composite multi-year concession between victims' council, advocacy grouping, government administrator, and the banks in an unparalleled attempt to get hold of restitution for the victims.
Unifying fractous parties within a blurred legal, social, and business landscape, Eizenstat used a exclusive approach of quantifying "rough justice" in order to apply the accountability of corporate entities and governments for past injustices in Switzerland, which outline the base of this learning.
Rough Justice Stuart Eizenstat and Holocaust-era Asset Restitution (A) case study solution
PUBLICATION DATE: March 29, 2013 PRODUCT #: 913037-HCB-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about GLOBAL BUSINESS
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Bitcoin
Lego: The Crisis
Readiness to Internationalize at Maynooth Natural Granite
Netflix Can it Recover From Strategy Mistakes
International Automotive Company
American Airlines in 2011
The Chinese Wireless Communications Industry in 2012 and Beyond: An Industry Note
Tokyo Jane
LabourNet: Empowering Informal Sector Labourers
Argentina’s YPF Sociedad Anonima (E): A New Era
