The “Advertisement procedure at Chung and Dasgupta, LLP” bundle of cases investigates the functions of general and firm-specific human capital in employee performance measurement, comments, and promotion/damages choices. In the cases, a leading law firm must decide whether to match an external venture offer to one of its leading litigators, when the litigator is not yet eligible for partnership in accordance with the existing rules where the business elects associates. A second non-litigator at the business has performed just along with the star litigator, but has no external venture offer, because her role and abilities are specific to the business, and much less invaluable to the market that is outdoor.
The case can be instructed with a role play, where one pupil plays the function of the non-litigator, along with another student plays the role of a formally-assigned mentor in the law firm's venture group. (If using the role play alternative, teachers should make use of the typical advice instance "The Promotion Process at Chung and Dasgupta, LLP," 914-044, and the functions: "Chung and Dasgupta: Information for Jordan Ramirez," 914-046, and "Chung and Dasgupta: Information for Casey Clark," 914-047.) It can also be educated as a normal case, without a role play, by using general info case "The Promotion Process at Chung and Dasgupta, LLP" (914-044) and "Chung and Dasgupta: Supplemental Information on Jordan Ramirez and Casey Clark" (914-045). The cases provide a rich backdrop to research issues around business-specific human capital, and can be used to discuss subjective performance evaluation, best practices when giving employee feedback, and livelihood at professional service businesses.PUBLICATION DATE: June 17, 2014 PRODUCT #: 914044-PDF-ENG
The Promotion Process at Chung and Dasgupta, LLP Case Study Solution
PUBLICATION DATE: June 17, 2014 PRODUCT #: 914044-PDF-ENG
This is just an excerpt. This case is about ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT