A State of Flux B: Reorganizing Public Health in Arkansas 2005 2007 Case Study Help
A State of Flux B: Reorganizing Public Health in Arkansas 2005 2007 is a case study in which I analyzed the state of the public health system in Arkansas in the year 2006. The problem statement, the case study solution, and recommendations are discussed.
Problem Statement
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the federal agency in charge of public health, but local public health departments are not the only ones that offer public health services. There are a number of other pertinent agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Food and Drug Administration. However, the demand for public health services has increased over the last few decades, resulting in a decline in funding for public health.
Many small local health departments have limited capacity to provide essential public health services. This issue has been addressed in a number of ways, ranging from consolidating two or more health departments to regionalizing health services. A key element of this process is that counties need to enter into formal inter-local agreements, which allow them to work together during an emergency.
Several states have begun to examine how to increase the capacity of their local public health departments. One example is Massachusetts, which enacted legislation to improve its ability to provide effective public health services. Similarly, Kansas is seeking to improve its capacity to deliver public health services.
While local public health officials in these states are interested in improving the quality of the services they deliver, they also recognize that they will need to address issues related to the ability of their agencies to meet the demands of the new regulations. These challenges include the capacity of local agencies to perform important functions and the availability of legal obstacles to achieving the desired level of consolidation.
Case Study Solution
The Working Group on Regionalization in Arkansas (WGRA) made a strong case for regionalization of public health services. It drew on research from other states and sectors to help lay the groundwork for regionalization. In addition, it highlighted the success of cooperative agreements and other models of service delivery.
Although WGRA has encountered challenges, such as federal budget cuts and local resistance to changing the public health system, the organization has been successful. As a result, it has been able to garner support for rethinking the local public health organization.
In the beginning, WGRA faced concerns over its intentions. However, the group has been able to alleviate these issues with the help of its Guiding Principles. These principles, which are shared in presentations and in all other dissemination materials, have helped to allay concerns over the project's purpose.
During the planning process, several unexpected events occurred. However, the WGRA leaders were able to quickly respond to these situations. Their efforts demonstrated that counties and health departments could work together to leverage resources.
As the project progressed, the ICH evaluation team used a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the planning process and the effectiveness of the regional model. This included interviews with local public health leaders, observations of the planning meetings, and documentation of monthly conference calls.
Participants found that the Guiding Principles were useful in focusing the planning process. Additionally, they reported that they had a better understanding of what public health services were needed in their communities. They also felt that their understanding of the value of the collaborative approach was better than it had been previously.
Porters Five Forces
The Porters Five Forces is an apt example of a tool used to analyze a competitive landscape. The model helps you to measure the level of competition and profit potential of an industry. It also helps you to determine the strengths and weaknesses of your competitors.
The five forces include the number of rivals, the concentration ratio, the customer power, the threat of new competitors, and the importance of the customer. These five forces can help you to understand your position in the market and make good business decisions.
A company that can lock up its customers in favorable terms has the power to increase prices and gain an edge over competitors. Conversely, a company with many substitutes has little power to increase prices.
If you are a new startup in a fast-growing industry, you could find yourself shut out of the game. High rivalry can lead to lower profits, so be sure to take the time to evaluate your business.
If you plan to enter a new industry, the Five Forces is a useful tool to help you assess your potential. Understanding the industry you are entering can help you determine its strengths and weaknesses and help you decide whether to expand, build stricter procedures, or try to woo new customers. By analyzing the Five Forces, you'll be able to boost your business's profitability and generate more earnings.
The model isn't perfect, but it does the job. You should always be watching for changes in the five forces and adjust your strategy accordingly.
PESTLE Analysis
The PESTLE analysis of public health in Arkansas reveals that the state is a relatively small and tightknit community with one statewide office of health and human services (OSHA) and several smaller health departments. Among the notable blemishes is a lack of an integrated statewide plan for the prevention, control, and treatment of diseases and injuries, as well as an underfunded and understaffed state emergency response team (SERT) in a disaster prone area. Likewise, the health care system is rife with misaligned priorities and mismanagement as well as a lack of leadership at all levels. This, coupled with a statewide aging workforce, means a need to reinvent the wheel. In order to re-invent the wheel, the state may have to re-evaluate how it operates and what it stands for.
Financial Analysis
In 2005-2007, a group of public health officials met to discuss the idea of regionalizing public health services. They agreed that a new organizational structure would increase the capacity of municipalities to deliver essential public health services.
Several challenges face local public health departments. These challenges include an aging workforce, limited funding, and the inability to meet mandated standards. A new approach to public health is needed to ensure that funding for essential services is maximized while retaining local control.
To make the case for the need for regionalization, the Working Group reviewed existing research on the topic. They also consulted with other service sectors to see how other states had addressed similar issues.
One of the most important aspects of the initiative was the creation of a set of guiding principles. This provided a shared framework for the planning and implementation of the project. Although the project has faced challenges, such as state budget cuts, it has made significant progress. It has laid the foundation for restructuring local public health in the state.
The Working Group is continuing to develop a plan for reorganizing local public health in the state. NACCHO has been awarded a grant to support the initiative and it has supported legal consultants, social marketing consultants, and finance consultants.
In the last two years, the Working Group has made several successes. It has worked to build support for the initiative by emphasizing the benefits of cooperative agreements and by highlighting successful regional efforts.
Recommendations
When asked what their biggest concern was with regionalization, participants said it was the loss of local control and municipal funds. The working group developed a plan to address these concerns.
A first step was to define a functional local health department. The Operational Definition of a Functional Local Health Department, created by NACCHO, defines a local health department's capacity to provide essential public health services. This definition includes a five-point scale ranging from No Capacity to Optimal Capacity.
One of the biggest challenges for many public health departments is staffing. According to a survey, 70% of respondents reported that their workforce was inadequate to perform basic regulatory responsibilities. In addition, most counties have a small population, which limits their capacity to provide public health services.
The Working Group recommended that local authorities could select from different models to meet their population's needs and budget constraints. This would help them to better leverage the resources available to them.
For example, the Working Group recommended that counties could work together to leverage their resources to better deliver public health services. This would increase the state's competitiveness for federal funds.
The Working Group also developed a set of Guiding Principles that would guide its work. These principles were designed to communicate the core values of the project. They would be used in public presentations and in other dissemination materials. It is these principles that helped to garner support for reorganizing local public health.
This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Airbus A3XX: Developing the Worlds Largest Commercial Jet (A)
Meeting the Diversity Challenge at PepsiCo: The Steve Reinemund Era
Social media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix
Cirque du Soleil–The High-Wire Act of Building Sustainable Partnerships
HubSpot: Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0
Symbian Google & Apple in the Mobile Space (A)
Sanctuary Soft: International Expansion Strategies
U.S. Subprime Mortgage Crisis: Policy Reactions (B)
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
HP: The Computer is Personal Again
